To the Editor:

On November 26, 2025, the IFN printed a story indicating that the Town of Troutman elected officials decided to sever their contractual relationship with then-Town Manager Ron Wyatt.

The article noted council decided to terminate then Wyatt’s employment due to his “inability to fulfill the duties and responsibilities outlined in his prior employment agreement within the specified timeframe.”

Despite having “just cause” for this termination, the Town Council approved a $100,000 severance payment and health benefits until Medicare eligibility.

I wrote to Mayor Teross Young Jr., asking what authority the council had to use taxpayer funds in this way. In his reply, the mayor skipped the severance issue but claimed that extending Mr. Wyatt’s insurance was consistent with the town’s precedent for retirees. Yet Mr. Wyatt was replaced for not being able to perform his job. I find the mayor’s response to be inadequate.

On January 8, 2026, I spoke at the council meeting and demanded answers. The mayor promised to follow up. I am still waiting.

My concerns are not related to Mr. Wyatt personally. My complaint is about the town’s elected officials potentially misusing taxpayers’ funds beyond the terms of Mr. Wyatt’s contract. Page 6, Paragraph B defines “just cause” termination (e.g., inability to perform duties for 120 days) with no benefits. Why ignore it? Ignoring a contract may fly privately but not when using public money.

The council’s unwillingness to explain its actions are reminiscent of its decision, without public discussion, to give Mr. Wyatt a 105% raise over four years.

The Troutman Town Council owes citizens a precise, transparent explanation. The explanation should include contract language or NC law citations. supported by legal doctrine.

Under NC Constitution Article V, Section 2(1), funds must serve public purpose – not individuals. This smells like a violation of the “Public Purpose Doctrine.”

Mr. Mayor and Council, the taxpayers want an explanation.

Dan Hester
Troutman